Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Harpers unfolding Income Trust Disaster

While Stephen Harper is scurrying around keeping in the dark and keeping his and his MPs mouths firmly shut, I thought it would be a good time to recap on the broken promise that has caused the most controversy, Income Trusts. It touches on many other broken promises and as events unfold is turning out to be a first class policy disaster the sort of thing that would give most finance minister nightmares.

The Story so far

Stephen Harpers breaks a solemn promise not to tax income trusts when his Finance Minister Jim Flaherty celebrates Halloween by announcing the “Tax Fairness Plan” a heavy tax on income trusts packaged with income splitting for retired pensioners a move which reduces the tax burden on high income seniors. The government claims it is losing $164 million a year in tax revenue due to income trusts.

The move shocks the markets and produces widespread condemnation in Canadian and Foreign press

Over the next week Income trust investors who “play by the rules” loss 35 Billion dollars, most have not recovered from these losses a year later.

Over the next months 7 reports by separate experts’ dispute that government is losing any tax revenue from income trusts, many show that trusts are net tax revenue positive.

Before a parliamentary committee Jim Flaherty once again claims that the government is losing significant tax revenue, the figure magically increases to at least 500 million a year.

When asked to show how he came up with these figures he produces 18 pages of blacked out information.

An Angus Reid poll indicates that 92% of Canadians think the government should reveal the blacked out information and explain its analyst.

A parliamentary committee recommends the Income Trust tax be reduced to 10% and be made refundable to Canadians, further study and separate legislation.

The government ignores Canadians and the parliamentary committee representing the majority of Canadians and limits discussion of the issue by incorporating the proposal unchanged into the budget

With enthusiastic support from the NDP the government omits to extend its rules changes to all forms of trusts including private equity trusts and large pension plans. What is left of the Governments "Tax Fairness" argument is shattered

In the following months enough Income Trusts are converted to these other structures to produce a $500 million a year loss in tax revenue to the government.

Bell Canada with its plans to convert to an income trust blocked is taken over by a combination of private (foreign) equity and Canadian pension plans, the government losses a further $800 million a year in tax revenue that income trust investors would have paid on there distributions.

The finance minister Jim Flaherty says, “It’s not my fault”

He does acknowledge that some tax will be paid on pensioners income although he didn’t include the taxes paid by income trust investors in the same way from their RRSPs, which way is it Jim?

The conversion of income trusts to other structures continue at an accelerated pace, if the present trend continues the tax revenue loss will reach $7.5 Billion a year by the time it ends. Equivalent to a 1.5% increase in the GST.

The Harper government continues to refuse to acknowledge or fix the problem it has created, this task will undoubtedly be left to the next “New Government”

Over 2.5 million angry income trust investors show no sign of forgiving and forgetting.

Private equity trusts and pension plans including those of government employees that “make up the rules” benefit.

The average Canadian who “plays by the rules” is left with the multi Billion dollar bill.

Don’t expect a thank you note

12 comments:

Agent Smith said...

I think they did the right thing. Good for Flahrety

Anonymous said...

Dear SHBP
There is doing the right thing and doing the right thing right.
Flahery screwed up (AGAIN).
But why would we be surprised. He is an angry Harrisite right winger.
He is gone from Ontario politics, loosing the leadership race here twice. (Harper..how can you be sooooo... stupid or bereft of talent to appoint Flahery, Baird and Tony Cement (sic) to cabinet)
His (Jim's) policy of funding religous schools, in part, cost his buddy Ernie the last Ontaio election and it's going to cost Tory the next one as well.
Blind ideology won't work in Canada. Voters seem like they are not paying attention but they know when to say no to an idea (ideology) that has not been thought through.

Tootrusting said...

Perhaps "agent smith" could expand on his/her comments.
In the meantime he/she is welcome to my share of the bill

Anonymous said...

top drawer post!
Hopefully you will stay on it; thanks.
foot'

Manuel said...

Personally I think people were too trusting with their money to investors when it came to income trusts, it was always a high risk investment, and their has always been talk to the tax coming, I lost money as well just not the sums of some of those who put their entire life savings in like a bunch of lemings (natures retard)

Anonymous said...

Well done on your part as this is a very concise and accurate account of Harper's fraudulent income trust policy.

You might want to add the fact that all Canadians will pay for this debacle on at least one level as Canada will potentially lose $7.5 billion in taxes if the entire sector goes the way of BCE and many other trusts to date, namely leveraged buyout by foreign private equity who will pay no Canadian taxes at either the business level or the owner level.

A loss of $7.5 billion will mean a noticeable drop in government programs and or increase in taxes. It would take a 1.5% increase in GST to make up for a loss of $7.5 billion in tax revenue.

Harper's income trust policy is wrong on every known and conceivable level. Reckless amateurs.

Brent Fullard
CAITI

Jean-Marie said...

Very well done TooTrusting.
Clear and loud, we have been left behind and fooled by the liars in charge.
Flaherty saying " It's not my fault " may be right. He lacks understanding AND knowledge.
BCE saga is telling the story : refuse the income trust structure and allow private equity to buy a big piece of the pie. What a dummy !
The worst Finance Minister Canada has ever had and will ever have. A comedy that someone has to sstop as soon as possible.

Great site and keep on the good fight. Rhe war is far from over.

Fogducker said...

Flaherty and Harper caved in to pressure from CEO's and Union heads to cull income trusts as they attracted too many of our investment dollars.
No tax leakage existed, no tax avoidance, no tax loop hole.

Just unjust unfair excessive tax on public trusts, not private trusts like Flaherty's not pension plans like Flaherty's. No the 73 % of us who do not have defined benefit pensions are being royally screwed.

We 73% will remember come next election. The CONS will go down to a massive defeat.

Fogducker said...

agent smith please tell us your reasoning. Say wasn't that you I saw with a rock in your hand at the peaceful protest.

youtube captured Harpers boys right on camera.

Flaherty is a goner with 73% of Canadians so is Harper. A liar with no integrity nor empathy for the ordinary Canadian.

We will retake the country from these neo CONS Bush clones.

Tootrusting said...

Manuel

Like you my losses were small less than 2% but I really feel for those people with large losses.

They were NOT investing in risky “Investment Sectors” like High Tech or small Gold Mining Stocks but an “Investment Class” like stocks, bonds or mutual funds, how do you think a 30% tax on mutual funds would go down? They also had the explicit promise of the Prime Minister of Canada that nothing would change and were “playing by the rules”

Unfortunately these investors are just looking like so much road kill as this train wreck of a policy heads on, there losses are beginning to pale in comparison to the billions of tax revenue that will be lost over the next 10 years.

I doubt if they will get much comfort from knowing all Canadians will be sharing there pain.

Anonymous said...

Ah, more bad news for Steve 'the lyin king' Harper and Jim 'it's not my fault' Flaherty. The lie won't die!

Neither of these fools should make any long term plans that extend beyond the next election. Methinks job hunting will be foremost on their agenda. the Cons are dead meat for at least a generation after this debacle.

Fogducker said...

anonymous I agree completely.

As a family we lost 170,000$ roughly 25% of our nest egg.

The CONS captured our votes last election with the promise to not tax income trusts, to introduce accountability. to reduce taxes and spending and waste.

Well they broke every promise they made and more. They increased our taxes and allowed Canada to be gutted. INCO Dofasco Hudsons Bay the list goes on and on. Now they are selling off government building and then leasing them for 25 years.

Would you sell your house then rent it for 25 years?

Its called short term gain for long term pain.

We former CONS supporters now need to help the Liberals get elected. The Liberals come with their own set of flaws and baggage and we need to help modify their thinking .

Less government less spending less taxes broad based tax cuts. Stop targeting tax breaks and welfare/grants to special groups.

Unmuzzle MP's to allow them to speak for their constituents. Introduce plebiscites to allow the people to decide on major issues.

In my neighborhood the CONS are as popular as a skunk at a picnic.